The Body is a Wonderland... |
bod·y [ˈbɒd-ee] noun, the physical part of a person; the flesh, as opposed to the spirit; consistency of substance; the largest or main part of anything. The body...what would be without our this awesome vessel? It is with us wherever we go, It contains everything we are and ever will be. While it isn't who we are, so much as what we are it is where we spend our entire lives and it is also where one should feel the most comfortable. It's our protector, our home, our temple, our instrument. Our one and only that provides for us through sickness and health. Is should be our first love although it often isn't. It's an amazing, awe inspiring wonderland of possibility. This blog is about my journey back to fitness and a healthy weight (again). If you are looking for INFORMATION and MOTIVATION to be your best you whether it be to lose weight, get fit or improve your health...hopefully you'll find it here! "Your body is a reflection of your daily habits and consistency of behavior, not the occasional choice." Keep it healthy my friends... |

(via siete-bella)
While we are on the subject
LOL @ this long list of people who just figured out how to open a banana like this. Also, humans are the only creatures that open bananas from the top because we’re the only ones that have the opposable thumbs necessary to do it.
And what the hell was he doing in the beginning? I thought I was watching one of those informercials where people do things wrong in highly exaggerated ways to sell unecessary products!
(Source: tuggysaurusrex, via umaysayimadreamer)
While these babies have to many carbs for my current diet plan they are know for being the perfect pre and post diet snack since they help re-energize your muscles. And since they are packed with potassium they real help you combat the post workout aches and cramps! I love them with yogurt and granola with a dash of cinnamon even though I can’t currently indulge.
(via run-for-your-soul)
If the members of the American medical establishment were to have a collective find-yourself-standing-naked-in-Times-Square-type nightmare, this might be it. They spend 30 years ridiculing Robert Atkins, author of the phenomenally-best-selling ”Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution” and ”Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution,” accusing the Manhattan doctor of quackery and fraud, only to discover that the unrepentant Atkins was right all along. Or maybe it’s this: they find that their very own dietary recommendations — eat less fat and more carbohydrates — are the cause of the rampaging epidemic of obesity in America. Or, just possibly this: they find out both of the above are true.
When Atkins first published his ”Diet Revolution” in 1972, Americans were just coming to terms with the proposition that fat — particularly the saturated fat of meat and dairy products — was the primary nutritional evil in the American diet. Atkins managed to sell millions of copies of a book promising that we would lose weight eating steak, eggs and butter to our heart’s desire, because it was the carbohydrates, the pasta, rice, bagels and sugar, that caused obesity and even heart disease. Fat, he said, was harmless.
Thirty years later, America has become weirdly polarized on the subject of weight. On the one hand, we’ve been told with almost religious certainty by everyone from the surgeon general on down, and we have come to believe with almost religious certainty, that obesity is caused by the excessive consumption of fat, and that if we eat less fat we will lose weight and live longer. On the other, we have the ever-resilient message of Atkins and decades’ worth of best-selling diet books, including ”The Zone,” ”Sugar Busters” and ”Protein Power” to name a few. All push some variation of what scientists would call the alternative hypothesis: it’s not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates, and if we eat less carbohydrates we will lose weight and live longer.
The perversity of this alternative hypothesis is that it identifies the cause of obesity as precisely those refined carbohydrates at the base of the famous Food Guide Pyramid — the pasta, rice and bread — that we are told should be the staple of our healthy low-fat diet, and then on the sugar or corn syrup in the soft drinks, fruit juices and sports drinks that we have taken to consuming in quantity if for no other reason than that they are fat free and so appear intrinsically healthy. While the low-fat-is-good-health dogma represents reality as we have come to know it, and the government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in research trying to prove its worth, the low-carbohydrate message has been relegated to the realm of unscientific fantasy.
If the members of the American medical establishment were to have a collective find-yourself-standing-naked-in-Times-Square-type nightmare, this might be it. They spend 30 years ridiculing Robert Atkins, author of the phenomenally-best-selling ”Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution” and ”Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution,” accusing the Manhattan doctor of quackery and fraud, only to discover that the unrepentant Atkins was right all along. Or maybe it’s this: they find that their very own dietary recommendations — eat less fat and more carbohydrates — are the cause of the rampaging epidemic of obesity in America. Or, just possibly this: they find out both of the above are true.
When Atkins first published his ”Diet Revolution” in 1972, Americans were just coming to terms with the proposition that fat — particularly the saturated fat of meat and dairy products — was the primary nutritional evil in the American diet. Atkins managed to sell millions of copies of a book promising that we would lose weight eating steak, eggs and butter to our heart’s desire, because it was the carbohydrates, the pasta, rice, bagels and sugar, that caused obesity and even heart disease. Fat, he said, was harmless.
Atkins allowed his readers to eat ”truly luxurious foods without limit,” as he put it, ”lobster with butter sauce, steak with béarnaise sauce … bacon cheeseburgers,” but allowed no starches or refined carbohydrates, which means no sugars or anything made from flour. Atkins banned even fruit juices, and permitted only a modicum of vegetables, although the latter were negotiable as the diet progressed.
Atkins was by no means the first to get rich pushing a high-fat diet that restricted carbohydrates, but he popularized it to an extent that the American Medical Association considered it a potential threat to our health. The A.M.A. attacked Atkins’s diet as a ”bizarre regimen” that advocated ”an unlimited intake of saturated fats and cholesterol-rich foods,” and Atkins even had to defend his diet in Congressional hearings.
Thirty years later, America has become weirdly polarized on the subject of weight. On the one hand, we’ve been told with almost religious certainty by everyone from the surgeon general on down, and we have come to believe with almost religious certainty, that obesity is caused by the excessive consumption of fat, and that if we eat less fat we will lose weight and live longer. On the other, we have the ever-resilient message of Atkins and decades’ worth of best-selling diet books, including ”The Zone,” ”Sugar Busters” and ”Protein Power” to name a few. All push some variation of what scientists would call the alternative hypothesis: it’s not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates, and if we eat less carbohydrates we will lose weight and live longer.If the members of the American medical establishment were to have a collective find-yourself-standing-naked-in-Times-Square-type nightmare, this might be it. They spend 30 years ridiculing Robert Atkins, author of the phenomenally-best-selling ”Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution” and ”Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution,” accusing the Manhattan doctor of quackery and fraud, only to discover that the unrepentant Atkins was right all along. Or maybe it’s this: they find that their very own dietary recommendations — eat less fat and more carbohydrates — are the cause of the rampaging epidemic of obesity in America. Or, just possibly this: they find out both of the above are true.
When Atkins first published his ”Diet Revolution” in 1972, Americans were just coming to terms with the proposition that fat — particularly the saturated fat of meat and dairy products — was the primary nutritional evil in the American diet. Atkins managed to sell millions of copies of a book promising that we would lose weight eating steak, eggs and butter to our heart’s desire, because it was the carbohydrates, the pasta, rice, bagels and sugar, that caused obesity and even heart disease. Fat, he said, was harmless.
Atkins allowed his readers to eat ”truly luxurious foods without limit,” as he put it, ”lobster with butter sauce, steak with béarnaise sauce … bacon cheeseburgers,” but allowed no starches or refined carbohydrates, which means no sugars or anything made from flour. Atkins banned even fruit juices, and permitted only a modicum of vegetables, although the latter were negotiable as the diet progressed.
Atkins was by no means the first to get rich pushing a high-fat diet that restricted carbohydrates, but he popularized it to an extent that the American Medical Association considered it a potential threat to our health. The A.M.A. attacked Atkins’s diet as a ”bizarre regimen” that advocated ”an unlimited intake of saturated fats and cholesterol-rich foods,” and Atkins even had to defend his diet in Congressional hearings.
Thirty years later, America has become weirdly polarized on the subject of weight. On the one hand, we’ve been told with almost religious certainty by everyone from the surgeon general on down, and we have come to believe with almost religious certainty, that obesity is caused by the excessive consumption of fat, and that if we eat less fat we will lose weight and live longer. On the other, we have the ever-resilient message of Atkins and decades’ worth of best-selling diet books, including ”The Zone,” ”Sugar Busters” and ”Protein Power” to name a few. All push some variation of what scientists would call the alternative hypothesis: it’s not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates, and if we eat less carbohydrates we will lose weight and live longer.
If the members of the American medical establishment were to have a collective find-yourself-standing-naked-in-Times-Square-type nightmare, this might be it. They spend 30 years ridiculing Robert Atkins, author of the phenomenally-best-selling ”Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution” and ”Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution,” accusing the Manhattan doctor of quackery and fraud, only to discover that the unrepentant Atkins was right all along. Or maybe it’s this: they find that their very own dietary recommendations — eat less fat and more carbohydrates — are the cause of the rampaging epidemic of obesity in America. Or, just possibly this: they find out both of the above are true.
When Atkins first published his ”Diet Revolution” in 1972, Americans were just coming to terms with the proposition that fat — particularly the saturated fat of meat and dairy products — was the primary nutritional evil in the American diet. Atkins managed to sell millions of copies of a book promising that we would lose weight eating steak, eggs and butter to our heart’s desire, because it was the carbohydrates, the pasta, rice, bagels and sugar, that caused obesity and even heart disease. Fat, he said, was harmless.
Atkins allowed his readers to eat ”truly luxurious foods without limit,” as he put it, ”lobster with butter sauce, steak with béarnaise sauce … bacon cheeseburgers,” but allowed no starches or refined carbohydrates, which means no sugars or anything made from flour. Atkins banned even fruit juices, and permitted only a modicum of vegetables, although the latter were negotiable as the diet progressed.
Atkins was by no means the first to get rich pushing a high-fat diet that restricted carbohydrates, but he popularized it to an extent that the American Medical Association considered it a potential threat to our health. The A.M.A. attacked Atkins’s diet as a ”bizarre regimen” that advocated ”an unlimited intake of saturated fats and cholesterol-rich foods,” and Atkins even had to defend his diet in Congressional hearings.
Thirty years later, America has become weirdly polarized on the subject of weight. On the one hand, we’ve been told with almost religious certainty by everyone from the surgeon general on down, and we have come to believe with almost religious certainty, that obesity is caused by the excessive consumption of fat, and that if we eat less fat we will lose weight and live longer. On the other, we have the ever-resilient message of Atkins and decades’ worth of best-selling diet books, including ”The Zone,” ”Sugar Busters” and ”Protein Power” to name a few. All push some variation of what scientists would call the alternative hypothesis: it’s not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates, and if we eat less carbohydrates we will lose weight and live longer.
Click here to continue reading
DailyBurn Life is a big advocate of eating real food for health and wellness. Yep, that includes eating fat too. The real stuff, not the fake stuff. We don’t need yet another study to tell us that, yet here it is.
A new study published in the American Psychological Association’s journal Behavioral Neuroscience finds that, “synthetic fat substitutes used in low-calorie potato chips and other foods could backfire and contribute to weight gain and obesity.”
The study, lead by Purdue psychology professor Susan E. Swithers, PhD, divided rats into two groups: one on a high fat diet and one on a generally low fat diet. Researchers then fed both groups high fat Pringles chips, but half of both groups were fed low fat Pringles chips that contain the fat substitute olestra half the time. Researchers found that it didn’t matter if the rats were on the high fat or low fat diets, the rats that ate the Pringles chips with the fat substitute olestra gained weight in both groups.
Olestra is a fat substitute that was introduced as a food additive in the early 1970′s.
It was discovered accidentally and quickly became popular as a calorie free, indigestible fat. In the late 1990’s, however, it fell out of favor because of the widespread uncomfortable side effects it caused in the digestive system. Olestra still remains on the market in some “lite” versions of popular processed foods.
As this study suggests, eating foods with olestra will cause more weight gain over time than eating the full fat versions of your favorite processed foods. If you are going to indulge, make sure you go for the real thing, not the substitute. Just eat a few bites, and you’ll be satisfied. There are no quick fixes when it comes to a healthy diet, and fat substitutes are no different.
Besides, those chips taste funny anyway. JUST EAT REAL FOOD!
(Source: life.dailyburn.com)
I can’t express in words how I feel about the taste of a perfectly ripe avocado. Think it may have something to do with being from So Cal. We love our Avocados & Guacamole! Mmmm. Good thing its a MUFA! So although its fatty, in moderation, its TOTALLY healthy…and always delish!
(Source: design-n-dine, via healthandcoffee)
Ok, so I keep hearing (and reading ) that these nutrients help you lose weight. I’m not a big fan of dairy as of late (although I adore cheese) but if it helps I would be willing to give it a shot…again. Come to think of it, when I ate more dairy (as well as peanut butter & Sushi) I was slimmer &…
This is so me and the Boyf! Lol
(via papa-bear-joe)
(Source: ttempussffugitt, via thehearttoflife)
If you’re eating tends to be pleasure-driven, you may be a hedonic eater. Eating for enjoyment or entertainment isn’t new. We often eat because food is available, it’s free, or we know it’s going to taste good, even if we’re not hungry. But researchers in Italy have identified a specific type of pleasure-driven eating they call hedonic eating. In a small study involving eight subjects scientists found that eating for gratification, rather than physiological hunger, triggers the release of hormones that up appetite, and therefore stimulate continued eating, even after satiety has been reached. In the study blood levels of hunger hormones surged after eating cakes, but not after eating bread, butter, and milk. While the connection isn’t completely understood, the hormonal reaction seems to occur with foods tied more closely with emotional, rather than physical, hunger.
I’m fascinated with this type of research because I devoted an entire chapter in MY NEWEST BOOK to emotional eating. In my years of working with clients I’ve seen that losing weight or eating healthfully isn’t simply about nutrition knowledge or having the right plan or recipes. We’re practically taught from birth to turn to food to feel good or at least feel better, whether it be for comfort, reward, escape, or celebration. In my opinion understanding that connection is the foundation of transforming your relationship with food and untangling eating from emotions. But it’s important to acknowledge that there is a physiological component.
Keep reading to find out if you are a Hedonic Eater. Are You a Hedonic Eater? - http://pulse.me/s/96HfH
beautifulpicturesofhealthyfood:
The recipe is two handfuls of baby spinach, 1 cup of chunk pineapple, 2 bananas, 1 cup of plain greek yogurt and 1 cup of filtered water. Blend well and enjoy
Top 10 Ways to Lose 10 Pounds Safely - http://pulse.me/s/4ID7s